Analyzing a previous students work
“Stuck” by canopy climbers
When analysing this student’s work, I used the OCR marking
criteria. The quality of this video is very high as it shows they used a good
and high quality camera. They have used a wide variety of camera angles which
include, close-up, long-shot, mid-shot. They also show very good camera control
and the video is always in focus, and is extremely steady. This gives the video
a very professional feel. There is a good variation of lighting used and
includes both natural bright light and dark lighting using fire a spotlight and
giving the video an edge, which enhances the quality of the video. They have
used a large variety of locations, which shows a lot of planning and
organisation went into the making of the video. The locations also fit well
with the story line of the video. They have clearly thought about the actor
used to portray the main character, which fits the video and lyrics. They have
used very good editing for this video such as fast scene changes, speeding up
shots such as the cloud scene at the beginning. As well as decreasing the
vibrancy of the video. The lip syncing is very good and is to a high
professional quality. The video is overall very clear and they have clearly
taken the lyrics, visuals, and music into consideration when making this video,
to create a excellent and professional video.
“It’s too late now” by ultrabeat v Darren
When analysing this student’s work, I used the OCR marking
criteria. The camera work is steady which shows some professional quality,
however is still very basic. They have used some different camera angles
including close-up, long and mid shot. However these are very basic and doesn’t
show a professional quality of camera angles. There is evidence of technical
skills such as having more than one shot in
a single frame however, it is not done to a professional quality as the
separate videos are squished together in the one frame and looks very
unprofessional and poor. The editing doesn’t really fit the video and some of
the lip syncing is out, and the actors haven’t paid attention to their facial
expression and body language as they look very awkward and again takes away the
quality of the video. They have used a variety of locations which shows good
planning and organisation, however some of the locations don’t make sense and
gives the video a bad professional quality. As well as this they haven’t paid
much attention to the type of lighting used and could of had a variety of
different lightings. This video is overall not very professional, as although
the story line is clear they haven’t paid much attention to the professional
quality of the video.
“Disco Lights” by
When analysing this student’s work, I used the OCR marking
criteria. From the beginning of the video the poor quality of the video is
obvious as the camera work is out of focus and isn’t steady, and shows poor
camera skills. They have a variety of different locations which shows some
planning. However there is evidence of not much planning as one location is in
what looks like a school corridor as they haven’t paid attention to what is in
the background. This makes the video look very unprofessional. This location
also does not fit with the story line of the video, which shows they haven’t
planned or organised the video properly. The lip syncing is to a basic standard
as there are some parts where the actor looks as though he has forgotten the
words, however is in sync most of the time. The actor hasn’t paid much
attention to his facial expression as at points in the video he smiles as
though he is going to laugh which makes the video look very unprofessional. He
also doesn’t make eye-contact with the camera and therefore does not engage
with the audience. they have given little thought to the editing of the video
as a lot of the shots are out of focus and look like they have been filmed on a
phone. the editing of the corridor scene doesn’t fit with the video and looks
rather random. They have however shown some technical skills with the cutting
at appropriate moments throughout the video. Overall the professional quality
is poor and little knowledge is shown throughout the video.























